This weblog is written by Cyrus F.
You can contact him at email
Channel 4 (UK) asks: How do you mark the 30th anni...
The monstrosity of ideas
President Obama?
Rhetoric as Thinking
Atri Hits the Nail on the Head
Hypocrisy and Human Rights
The Economist: On Iran, Higher risks
Economist: Men of Principle
Iran's Record Worsening
Arafat, Castro and Che ...
@ del.icio.us/libiran
13 August 2006
20 August 2006
27 August 2006
03 September 2006
10 September 2006
17 September 2006
24 September 2006
01 October 2006
19 November 2006
03 December 2006
25 March 2007
01 April 2007
08 April 2007
15 April 2007
29 April 2007
13 May 2007
20 May 2007
27 May 2007
03 June 2007
10 June 2007
17 June 2007
24 June 2007
08 July 2007
15 July 2007
05 August 2007
30 September 2007
14 October 2007
21 October 2007
02 November 2008
08 February 2009
BR "Blogroll Me!"

technorati search

» Blogs that link here
» View my technorati profile
"Join a conversation with the world's leading minds."

A Democratic Iran
American Islamic Congress
A Reasonable Man
The Atlantic Online
Blogs x Iranians
The Economist
Daniel Pipes
Free Muslims Coalition Against Terror
Girl on the Rights
Iranian Woman - زن ایرانی
Jonathan Derbyshire
Little Green Footballs
Setting the World to Rights
The Spirit of Man
TCS Daily
Winds of Change
CC License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by Blogger
Liberal Iranian
Liberal as in Liberty and Freedom. Iranian as in Cyrus and Ferdowsi.
Saturday, December 09, 2006
technorati tags:
If the American era in the Middle East is ending, as argued by some analysts, what is likely to replace it? Chaos? Self-determination? Iranian hegemony? A new caliphate?
- David Ignatius & Fareed Zakaria
First, let me say that the American era in the Middle East is not ending, and the mentioned analysts are wrong.

America is having problems and clearly needs to change and adjust some of her policies, but her Middle East era is not ending precisely for the answers sought to the question asked by Messrs. Ignatius and Zakaria: there is no regional or global player nearly as strong as the US to fill the void. The possibility of chaos is very real. However, the moral dilemmas faced by the US if it were to leave the Middle East to burn in chaos must be enough reason to keep her involved. As to self-determination, I don't see the American involvement in the Middle East as a hurdle, but an aid to that end: Even in Iraq, which is host to a few hundred thousand American and allied forces, it is not self-determination which is threatened, but security, and that only by ideology-driven terrorists, disgruntled Sunnis, and angry Shiites. If anything, the American presence has brought elections that are the primary tools for self-determination.

American era is not ending, and for the better.